President Trump this week brushed aside a wave of AI-safety warnings from OpenAI’s Sam Altman and Anthropic’s Dario Amodei, posting on Truth Social that “There is a SICK conspiracy going on against AI and Data Centers” and arguing the only guardrail the technology needs is “a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT,” according to Newsmax.
Why it matters: The clash pits the administration’s race to beat China on AI against a chorus that now includes the industry’s own CEOs calling for federal safety rules — a fight over whether Washington reins in a technology the president says can’t be allowed to slow down.
Driving the news:
Trump’s Truth Social post dismissed calls for new AI guardrails and argued that restricting U.S. developers would only hand China an advantage, per Newsmax.
OpenAI’s Sam Altman warned AI progress could go “very badly” in two ways — humanity “losing control of the future to AI,” or an “extraordinarily powerful AI” letting “one person or company…impress their worldview onto everyone else” — and said the industry should “pace” development rather than stop it, per Fox News.
Anthropic’s Dario Amodei went further: “I won’t lie to you – there are real dangers,” he said, adding the industry had “lied to people” about AI’s risks for too long and that an AI “kill switch could be a good idea,” per Fox News.
Trump separately told reporters he wants governors and mayors to welcome AI data centers in their communities, citing “enormous” construction jobs and tax revenue, per Fox Business.
By the numbers:
$500 billion: the private-sector AI infrastructure investment Trump has championed under the “Stargate” project, which he’s cited while pushing back on new restrictions, per Fox Business.
A majority of Americans oppose new AI data centers being built in their own communities, per a Gallup poll cited by Fox Business, largely over power and water demands.
What they’re saying:
The other side: White House AI adviser David Sacks dismissed the sudden wave of alarm as a “well-orchestrated media op” meant to justify a “government takeover of AI,” noting a Wall Street Journal story on an Anthropic researcher’s resignation published just 18 minutes before the researcher’s own public post, which advocacy groups then rushed to amplify. Sacks argued China has no equivalent movement pushing to slow AI down, so a U.S. pause would only hand Beijing the advantage, per RealClearPolitics.
The bottom line: Trump’s own AI industry leaders are now sounding the alarms he’s calling conspiracy theories — a split that’s less about whether AI is powerful than about who gets to decide when it’s too dangerous to keep accelerating.
Go deeper: