This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Joe diGenova, the veteran prosecutor Trump tapped to run the Justice Department’s “grand conspiracy” investigation into the Trump-Russia probe’s origins, abruptly resigned Thursday — without a single indictment to show for it.

Why it matters: Fox News reports diGenova had lost the confidence of both the Justice Department and the White House and was “effectively sidelined” for months before he left — raising fresh doubts about whether the marquee investigation into Trump’s perceived Russiagate adversaries ever produces charges.

Driving the news:

  • diGenova, a Reagan-era U.S. Attorney, was hired April 20, 2026 as Counselor to Attorney General Todd Blanche to run the probe, based out of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida, per Gateway Pundit.

  • He resigned Thursday at 3 p.m., telling the Washington Examiner it had been “a privilege and an honor to serve the president.”

  • Gateway Pundit reports former CIA Director John Brennan was the probe’s primary target, with former FBI Director James Comey and ex-FBI officials Peter Strzok and Lisa Page also implicated.

  • Trump and senior DOJ officials had grown frustrated with the investigation’s pace despite dozens of subpoenas issued over the past year, according to Gateway Pundit.

By the numbers:

  • ~5 months — how long diGenova ran the probe, from his April 20 hiring to his Sept. 10 resignation.

  • 0 — indictments the investigation produced during his tenure.

  • Dozens — subpoenas issued to Trump-Russia-probe veterans over the past year, per Gateway Pundit.

What they’re saying: “If you want indictments where there’s no evidence, you have an ethical problem,” diGenova said when asked about his resignation, per Gateway Pundit.

The other side: diGenova later called that remark “taken out of context,” saying “there’s plenty of evidence in all of these cases to prove the theories of prosecution — it just takes time” — insisting the holdup is prosecutorial diligence, not a lack of proof, per Gateway Pundit.

The bottom line: A high-profile Trump loyalist leaving his signature investigation empty-handed underscores how hard it’s proven to turn years of Russiagate grievances into actual criminal charges — and puts pressure on Blanche’s DOJ to show the probe can still deliver.

Go deeper: